A DAY WITH MY GIRL

To watch my video Blog just visit the link:

https://m.youtube.com/results?q=reggiecayanong&sm=3

REGGIE CAYANONG

All about my friends

Where would you be without you True Friends?

Childhood Friends, School Friends, Neighborhood Friends, Highschool Friends, College Friends, Work Friends, Bestfriends, Boyfriends and Girlfriends

We work our entire lives building friendships. From preschool, where we all learn that “it takes a friend or friends to make friends,” though adulthood, where we mingle at bars and water coolers, we crave closeness with other human beings. So I’m proudly to present to you all, my bullshit bestfriends.

“We are the Bullshit Trio”

The one who is holding the camera is Reymundo Soriano but we called him as Monds. Monds is my best friend because he is always there when I need him. He gives me advices that helps me to solve my problems.

His Girlfriend is also the bestfriend of my Girlfriend.

Monds is a funny guy and he can make you feel happy when you hang out with him. He is very kind and always there for me to help me.

The one who is holding the camera in this photo is James Simmon P. Balagtas but we simply called him as Mon/Moi or Mong. He is the craziest in our gang. Mong is single but he is the one who gives us happiness. Mong is the shortest in our group but he is the craziest one.

He is a lovable person and always there when you need him.

THAT’S ALL GUYS THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY BLOG!!

ALL ABOUT ME

-Hi Guys! I’m so glad to introduce myself to all of you and tell some information about myself. My name is Reggie R. Cayanong but you can call me Reg if you want. Reg is the shorter term for my name. I am 16 years old and born on February 23, 2001 at Sibuyan Island Romblon. My parents are Gilda R. Cayanong and Roseller G. Cayanong.

-I am a grade 11 student at Sti College Sta Rosa Laguna. The track that I chose is STEM because I love math and Science. My Previous School was Pulong Sta Cruz National Highschool and Pulong Sta Cruz Elementary School.

My Hobbies are:

• -          Playing Basketball
• -          Scrolling at Social Media
• -          Playing Online games

MY AMBTION 

• My ambition is to be a Seaman Because I don't want to be mama's boy for entire life. May be I want to take risks and explore my life with experience and thrill than to just stay stagnant at one place. Rest assured parents will be more than proud when they will know that their child can handle risks on his own without parents pampering ! And they will be glad to see  that  sense of achievement in their children. and because I want to gain money fast.

Immanuel Kant

REGGIE CAYANONG

REGGIE R. CAYANONG                                                                     STEM111-1A

Immanuel Kant ( 22 April 1724 – 12 February 1804)

Introduction  

            A German philosopher who is a central figure in modern philosophy. Kant argued that the human mind creates the structure of human experience, that reason is the source of morality, that aesthetics arises from a faculty of disinterestedjudgment, that space and time are forms of our sensibility, and that the world as it is "in-itself" is independent of our concepts of it. Kant took himself to have effected a "Copernican revolution" in philosophy, akin to Copernicus' reversal of the age-old belief that the sun revolved around the earth. His beliefs continue to have a major influence on contemporary philosophy, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political theory, and aesthetics.

            Kant lived in the remote province where he was born for his entire life. His father, a saddler, was, according to Kant, a descendant of a Scottish immigrant, although scholars have found no basis for this claim; his mother, an uneducated German woman, was remarkable for her character and natural intelligence. Both parents were devoted followers of the Pietist branch of the Lutheran church, which taught that religion belongs to the inner life expressed in simplicity and obedience to moral law. The influence of their pastor made it possible for Kant—the fourth of nine children but the eldest surviving child—to obtain an education.

            At the age of eight Kant entered the Pietist school that his pastor directed. This was a Latin school, and it was presumably during the eight and a half years he was there that Kant acquired his lifelong love for the Latin classics, especially for the naturalistic poet Lucretius. In 1740 he enrolled in the University of Königsberg as a theological student. But, although he attended courses in theology and even preached on a few occasions, he was principally attracted to mathematics andphysics. Aided by a young professor who had studied Christian Wolff, a systematizer of rationalist philosophy, and who was also an enthusiast for the science of Sir Isaac Newton, Kant began reading the work of the English physicist and, in 1744, started his first book, Gedanken von der wahren Schätzung der lebendigen Kräfte (1746; Thoughts on the True Estimation of Living Forces), dealing with a problem concerning kinetic forces Kant was one of the foremost thinkers of the Enlightenmentand arguably one of the greatest philosophers of all time.

Body

            The Critique of Practical Reason (German: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, KpV) is the second of Immanuel Kant's three critiques, first published in 1788. It follows on from Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and deals with his moral philosophy. The second Critique exercised a decisive influence over the subsequent development of the field of ethics and moral philosophy, beginning with Johann Gottlieb Fichte's Doctrine of Science and becoming, during the 20th century, the principal reference point for deontological moral philosophy. Kant sketches out here what is to follow. Most of these two chapters focus on comparing the situation of theoretical and of practical reason and therefore discusses how the Critique of Practical Reason compares to the Critique of Pure Reason. The first Critique was a critique of the pretensions of pure theoretical reason to attain metaphysical truths beyond the ken of applied theoretical reason. The conclusion was that pure theoretical reason must be restrained, because it produces confused arguments when applied outside of its appropriate sphere. However, the Critique of Practical Reason is not a critique of pure practical reason, but rather a defense of it as being capable of grounding behaviour superior to that grounded by desire-based practical reasoning. It is actually a critique, then, of the pretensions of applied practical reason. Pure practical reason must not be restrained, in fact, but cultivated.

            Kant informs us that while the first Critique suggested that God, freedom, and immortality are unknowable, the second Critique will mitigate this claim. Freedom is indeed knowable because it is revealed by God. God and immortality are also knowable, but practical reason now requires belief in these postulates of reason. Kant once again invites his dissatisfied critics to actually provide a proof of God's existence and shows that this is impossible because the various arguments (ontological, cosmological and teleological) for God's existence all depend essentially on the idea that existence is a predicate inherent to the concepts to which it is applied. Kant insists that the Critique can stand alone from the earlier Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, although it addresses some criticisms levelled at that work. This work will proceed at a higher level of abstraction.

Conclusion

            Immanuel Kant is one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western philosophy. His contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics have had a profound impact on almost every philosophical movement that followed him. This article focuses on his metaphysics and epistemology in one of his most important works, The Critique of Pure Reason.  A large part of Kant’s work addresses the question “What can we know?” The answer, if it can be stated simply, is that our knowledge is constrained to mathematics and the science of the natural, empirical world. It is impossible, Kant argues, to extend knowledge to the super sensible realm of speculative metaphysics. The reason that knowledge has these constraints, Kant argues, is that the mind plays an active role in constituting the features of experience and limiting the mind’s access only to the empirical realm of space and time.